Krzysztof Foltman wrote:
> Such a change could also give you problems if you expose
> implementation-defined values (as opposed to real-life-compatible units)
> to users. Think of backward compatibility, for example.
good point.
>> While ideas are being tossed about, here are some more...
>>
> Be careful: I can't speak for everyone, but after years of stagnation it
> would be nice to get a useful 1.2 out of the door without trying to cram
> every possible good idea into it.
fair play, it was late and I was overly enthusiastic :)
does anyone have access to ladspa.org? perhaps these and other ideas can be
noted in some sort of a roadmap?
regards,
Fraser
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sat Jun 20 08:15:01 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jun 20 2009 - 08:15:02 EEST