On Mon, 22.06.09 23:19, Jörn Nettingsmeier (nettings@email-addr-hidden-hochschule.de) wrote:
> so what is this about? rt users want absolute control over their
> machine. anybody who can tolerate some arbitrary bits of policy thrown
> at them during work is by definition not an rt user.
> rt users must be trustable with root access, at least in terms of cpu
> governance, which is what rtlimits achivev just fine.
What is so difficult to understand that rtkit is not intended to be a
solution for hardcore rt users?
rtkit is not for you!
Let me repeat this:
RTKIT IS NOT FOR YOU!
rtkit is a just missing piece of the puzzle that allows distros to
enable RT by default for their desktop users.
And rtkit doesn't break RLIMIT_PRIO, it isn't even activated when that
is set.
Let me repeat this, too:
RTKIT DOESN'T BREAK RLIMIT_RTPRIO!
It was clearly a bad idea to post about rtkit on lad. It is a big
waste of time fighting this through against all those desktop-haters,
fdo-haters, dbus-haters, who apparently believe I am out to take away
their freedom to run their systems the way want. I really don't need
this shit. The amount of constructive criticism in this thread is next
to zero, nobody even bothers to read the README before just fudding
around.
Lennart
-- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-devReceived on Tue Jun 23 04:15:03 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jun 23 2009 - 04:15:03 EEST