Re: [LAD] RFC: Default discovery paths for LADSPA, LRDF, LV2 and DSSI (and more?)

From: Steve Harris <steve@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Jun 26 2009 - 13:45:34 EEST

On 25 Jun 2009, at 18:01, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
>
> It is reasonable for LADSPA hosts to show duplicate versions of a
> plugin, for LV2 I guess the user would have to choose which
> implementation to use instead (this is because of URIs), unless
> there are better ways to handle this... Dave?

It's not reasonable unless they have different LADPSA IDs. LADSPA
plugins are not supposed to change their behaviour significantly
without changing IDs.

It's not really a tenable situation anyway, how would the user pick
between them? If you want to move apps, how would the other host pick
the same one reliably?

- Steve
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri Jun 26 16:15:01 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 26 2009 - 16:15:01 EEST