Re: [LAD] RFC: Default discovery paths for LADSPA, LRDF, LV2 and DSSI (and more?)

From: David Robillard <dave@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Jul 07 2009 - 01:27:36 EEST

On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 11:05 +0100, Chris Cannam wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 5:01 AM, David Robillard<dave@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > There are conflicts with the unique ID too, but there's no accounting
> > for broken plugins I guess.
>
> Filename/label can be made to work; "unique" ID can't, for any dynamic
> or automatically generated plugin library.
>
> Take dssi-vst for example. It consists of a single library that
> publishes many LADSPA plugins, whose number and type are unknown until
> run time. It can't map them onto a reserved range because it doesn't
> know in advance what plugins it may have to wrap. It can't
> realistically generate a good hashed value, because of the range
> limitation given in the LADSPA header ("below 0x1000000") and the need
> to avoid reserved ranges. It can't pass through the VST plugin's
> existing numerical ID, because these are typically generated by
> mapping from strings or hashing, and consequently are also usually out
> of range, and anyway it can't know whether a LADSPA plugin of the same
> ID already exists.

None of this makes the filename/label any less of a weak identifier in
the long-term.

It's an acceptable identifier only at runtime, on a single system, while
the plugin is loaded. Certainly not in save files.

Should LADSPA have used a better ID? Yes.
Did it? No.
Is soname:label an ID for a given plugin? No.

> Never rely on the "unique" ID of a LADSPA plugin.

Never rely on the soname/label either.

> (URIs are far better than either filename/label or numerical ID of course.)

Bingo.

If people are seriously considering a new ladspa revision, this is
something that should actually be taken care of. Far more important
than what got that ball rolling in the first place...

-dr

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Tue Jul 7 04:15:01 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jul 07 2009 - 04:15:01 EEST