On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Steve Harris<steve@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> But, what about, from now on, all LADSPA labels should be the plugin
> URI (only restriction is non whitespace, fine)
Nice in theory, though one problem with my preference for using
filename/label is that it offers more scope for weird programmer
foibles. The only restriction in the spec may be "no whitespace", but
I expect hosts may have other peculiarities. I haven't checked but I
wouldn't be surprised if some of my own code breaks if certain
characters are found in the label ('"', ':', '<', '>', '&' spring to
mind as possible candidates). And let's just wait for the first
security advisory for a buffer overflow in LADSPA plugin label
handling...
> Will break any hosts the check to see if the UID is in the legitimate
> range of course.
... though that said, people do dumb things with numbers too
sometimes. I have seen code that tried to store LADSPA plugin IDs in
floats (!) thus ending up with rounding error for large ID values.
(Not my code, honest.)
Chris
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Tue Jul 7 16:15:02 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jul 07 2009 - 16:15:02 EEST