On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 23:01 -0400, laseray@email-addr-hidden wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 July 2009 22:38:03 David Robillard wrote:
> > at revision 12, this project is (in my non-lawyer non-authoritative
> > opinion, etc), very obviously and correctly licensed under the GPL
> > version 2 or later, in the way recommended by the FSF.
>
> The raw code seems okay over there. Running ant to make a dist
> package results in something that violates the GPL if a user were
> to distribute it.
No, it does not, and even if it did, this would not be a GPL violation
on Prof. Keller's part.
-dr
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed Jul 29 08:15:06 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jul 29 2009 - 08:15:07 EEST