Re: [LAD] Impro-Visor created on sourceforge

On Tuesday 28 July 2009 22:38:18 laseray@email-addr-hidden wrote:
> Whether he wanted to or not, use of GPL code makes it GPL code.

I don't think this is correct. It would only mean that if he were not to GPL
the code he would be in violation of the original author's copyrights (this
is a generic he here and I am not speaking to this particular case as I have
not followed this closely enough.) If he did not want to GPL his own code, he
could stop distribution, work out another license with the original author or
any number of other things surely. He would still have the already existing
copyright violations to face should the original author choose to persue them
though.

> That is
> the viral nature of GPL. End of story. Not putting out source or including
> the license files does not make his changes/code not be GPL.

However, having the binary claim to be GPL but not releasing the needed source
does not stop it from being under the GPL to my initial understanding.

> I think you
> are thinking too much in the vain of convention copyrights. The code is
> automatically GPL by way of use of other GPL code. It no longer is some
> independent proprietary code solely belonging to the original copyright
> holder once mixed together.

If I get the time, I seem to remember some FSF pages that disagree with this
and point rather to the thoughts I posted above but I am snowed under at the
moment.
>
> Raymond

all the best,

drew
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu Aug 6 04:15:08 2009