Re: [LAD] Impro-Visor created on sourceforge

From: Raymond Martin <laseray@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sat Aug 08 2009 - 23:05:42 EEST

On Saturday 08 August 2009 15:44:41 drew Roberts wrote:
> On Saturday 08 August 2009 14:25:37 Patrick Shirkey wrote:
> > Sorry but how exactly is this different from a fork?  Is there a guide
> > that you have read somewhere that explains the exact steps required for
> > making a fork? Why have you now decided that you are not actually
> > forking the project when you originally declared that was the intended
> > result of your efforts?
>
> Perhaps his stated intention was to fork but his point is that at this
> point at least, no fork exists? Perhaps at this point, all that exists is
> the original binary and a decompiled version of the source? (Along with new
> text documents? Guessing here from the threads, not from checking either of
> the projects.)

There is no decompiled source anywhere on the project. It is all code
straight from the original Impro-Visor on SF.

Raymond
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sun Aug 9 00:15:06 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Aug 09 2009 - 00:15:07 EEST