Re: [LAD] Impro-Visor created on sourceforge

On Saturday 08 August 2009 15:59:56 you wrote:
> On 08/09/2009 06:05 AM, Raymond Martin wrote:
> > On Saturday 08 August 2009 15:44:41 drew Roberts wrote:
> >> On Saturday 08 August 2009 14:25:37 Patrick Shirkey wrote:
> >>> Sorry but how exactly is this different from a fork? Is there a guide
> >>> that you have read somewhere that explains the exact steps required for
> >>> making a fork? Why have you now decided that you are not actually
> >>> forking the project when you originally declared that was the intended
> >>> result of your efforts?
> >>
> >> Perhaps his stated intention was to fork but his point is that at this
> >> point at least, no fork exists? Perhaps at this point, all that exists
> >> is the original binary and a decompiled version of the source? (Along
> >> with new text documents? Guessing here from the threads, not from
> >> checking either of the projects.)
> >
> > There is no decompiled source anywhere on the project. It is all code
> > straight from the original Impro-Visor on SF.
>
> Ok, Just to get this straight in my head.
>
> After you decompiled the code and threatened to put the results of your
> labour online as a fork which encouraged Bob Keller to finally publish
> the code in a public repo you have now taken that code and changed it
> just a little bit, given it exactly the same name and are hosting it at
> the same location as the official public release?

That is what is there for now. So lots of people have been complaining about
nothing.

Raymond

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sun Aug 9 00:15:08 2009