Re: [LAD] FLTK vs GTKmm

From: Christian <krampenschiesser@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Aug 10 2009 - 13:11:08 EEST

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>>> I'm just curious what your long-time experiences with these
>>> gui-libraries are.
>>> Considering to use one of these two but can't really decide.
>>> But I do not want to switch in a year or two...
>> Well, I can't say anything about developing with either one of them, but
>> I think you should also take into account how the result will look and
>> feel.
>>
>> All examples of FLTK I know of look horribly out of place on a modern
>> desktop. Like, the 80ies want their GUIs back!
>
> There are other GUI toolkits that can look so much better. For instance, Qt
> and wxWidgets. Why are you settling for the two choices given?
>
> Raymond
Well I don't want to get into qt as I don't need these dependencies(and
qmake)
And I don't like wxWidgets example code.
I'll stick to gtkmm.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkp/8jwACgkQVC26eJ+o0+37jQCfdHs/u9IMYEfk5B8r6wzxGfPd
4gYAn0GRlnSZI5QnQ1Ary6SgZCDZI2WI
=07/f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon Aug 10 20:15:08 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Aug 10 2009 - 20:15:08 EEST