Re: [LAD] rtirq script is broken with 2.6.31

Robin Gareus wrote:
> Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
>> Robin Gareus wrote:
>>>
>>> A minor thing: the status regexp in line 291:
>>> egrep '(^[[:blank:]]*PID|IRQ|irq)'
>>> also matches the rtirq.sh script itself. Thus I proposed to use
>>> egrep '(^[[:blank:]]*PID|IRQ|irq\/|sirq\-|softirq)'
>>>
>>> Also on the 64studio (with 2.6.29 and mawk) there's no additional info
>>> shown for the interrupts (due to the [:blank:]) but I can live with that.
>>>
>> that's probably something that you weren't seeing anyway before, so
>> you'll surely live with it still ;)
>
> yeah, forget about the [:blank:] issue with mawk; but I still consider
> rtirq itself being listed on `rtirq status` a minor bug ;)
>

hopefully fixed in:
  http://www.rncbc.org/jack/rtirq-20090810.tar.gz
enjoy

-- 
rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela
rncbc@email-addr-hidden
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev