Re: [LAD] FLTK vs GTKmm

From: Jens M Andreasen <jens.andreasen@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Aug 11 2009 - 10:04:43 EEST

On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 07:45 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> O
> If that's what the CUDA interface to the outside world looks like then
> wouldn't it be better to expose it as a JACK App, which loads CUDA-
> specific plugins onto the graphics card?
>
> I don't see why you'd want to embed it in the jack daemon.
>

It is the scatter/gathering of data that is killing. I need to have one
and only one transfer on the PCIe line for each period to be efficient,
preferably in the 10 - 20KB range or more. The jack model of one
channel, one buffer does not fit very well here.

Potentially It should also be possible to stream from harddisk via DMA
directly to the device without bothering the CPU at all. That OIOH hand
would work for prerecorded material with say ardour, since you can look
ahead as many bytes as you like.

Doing live performances requres another approach though.

Do you believe it would be very difficult to implement? I do
unfortunately not have the required knowledege of jackd internals to
judge wether or not.
 

> - Steve
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Tue Aug 11 12:15:02 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Aug 11 2009 - 12:15:02 EEST