Re: [LAD] Lv2 port replication [was Re: the role of lv2 extensions]

From: james morris <james@email-addr-hidden-art.net>
Date: Thu Aug 13 2009 - 00:14:25 EEST

On 12/8/2009, "David Robillard" <dave@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

>On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 23:00 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 09:46:58PM +0100, james morris wrote:
>>
>> > Say you have a LP filter plugin processing a stereo stream. It has one
>> > port for the cutoff and two ports for input, therefor two for output.
>> > What happens if you decide you want independent control over the cutoff
>> > for the two channels?
>>
>> That is the essential difference between a plugin being used in
>> a multichannel stream and one being used for polyphonic synthesis,
>> where the cutoff frequency could be a per-voice envelope.
>> Provided the plugin can do both, it is the *host* that has to make
>> clear what's required.
>
>++
>
>Though in the latter case, it's probably best to just instantiate the
>thing twice as hosts currently do (and will likely need to implement
>regardless).
>

Or ganging the control ports?
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu Aug 13 04:15:01 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Aug 13 2009 - 04:15:01 EEST