Re: [LAD] Lv2 port replication [was Re: the role of lv2 extensions]

From: Steve Harris <steve@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Aug 13 2009 - 01:15:48 EEST

On 12 Aug 2009, at 22:20, David Robillard wrote:
>>> Though in the latter case, it's probably best to just instantiate
>>> the
>>> thing twice as hosts currently do (and will likely need to implement
>>> regardless).
>>>
>>
>> Or ganging the control ports?
>
> You could, but if the whole plugin including controls is going to
> replicate there's little benefit to replication. Maybe some
> efficiency...
>
> It's the plugin author's decision, really, but the "replicate audio
> but
> single set of controls" is the 99% case.

Yes, most importantly it lets you handle the cases that the host can't
eg. multichannel compression. I guess reverb would be another example,
but I don't know how multichannel reverb works.

In that situation, offering per-channel controls makes no sense.

- Steve
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu Aug 13 04:15:03 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Aug 13 2009 - 04:15:03 EEST