Re: [LAD] Lv2 port replication [was Re: the role of lv2 extensions]

From: David Robillard <dave@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Aug 13 2009 - 01:44:16 EEST

On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 23:39 +0100, james morris wrote:
> On 12/8/2009, "Steve Harris" <steve@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> >On 12 Aug 2009, at 23:20, David Robillard wrote:
> >>
> >> Allow one group of ports to have either no replication, or the same
> >> replication count as another group of ports. Obvious example being,
> >> controls tend to stick to 1, audio tends to get replicated, but we may
> >> want to replicate the controls to match audio. So, a single plugin
> >> could do all of the above cases in a single instance, if the author
> >> wants to do it that way.
> >
> >That makes sense to me.
> >
>
> that's what i thought what i said implied [scratches head].

... I don't think "or ganging the control ports" really quite conveys
the idea entirely ;)

-dr

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu Aug 13 04:15:05 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Aug 13 2009 - 04:15:05 EEST