On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:29 PM, David Robillard<dave@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> Gtkmm is quite nice for the more C++ minded. Much nicer standard C++
> style than the cracked out preprocessed pseudo-C++ insanity that is Qt,
> at any rate.
As Pedro says, Qt just contains a code generator; you still end up
with C++. I don't think the differences between Qt and libsigc++
signal/slot mechanisms are all that much to be worried about --
libsigc++ gets you "purer" C++ but Qt involves less typing,
particularly of those pesky angle brackets. They both work. Good
material for endless pub arguments, but not worth getting in a froth
about when you're actually coding.
(I generally use Qt, and I would say that Qt4 is a very fine library
in general. Not much wrong with GTKmm either though.)
Chris
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri Aug 14 20:15:04 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Aug 14 2009 - 20:15:04 EEST