Re: [LAD] Multi-Channel channel order

David Robillard wrote:
> Is there any existing 'standard' for the order of channels for
> higher-than-stereo multi-channel streams?
>
> I'd assume this would be defined for interleaving or something, though
> that's not what it's needed for: I think the port groups extension
> should specify an order for all the channels of the various types of
> group. Though this isn't necessary useful in the normal case (ports are
> separate ala LADSPA), with this replication stuff and presumably other
> things the host and plugin are going to have to deal with sets of
> buffers, and having a predefined standard order for them seems like it
> would make life a lot simpler and faster (and not having one seems to
> have no benefit).
>
> For example, for discrete non-interleaved 5.1 (using a full channel for
> the .1) we have 6 channels: left, center, right, rear left, rear right,
> LFE (see http://lv2plug.in/ns/dev/port-groups#FivePointOneGroup)
>
> What order should these be passed in? Any existing practices?

don't know about x.1, but for ambisonics, the emerging standard seems to
be the "ambisonic channel number" scheme as defined here:
http://ambisonics.ch/standards/channels/
most favoured normalization scheme is sn3d, i.e. plugins will have to
deal with inputs greater than 1.0f.

of course, most applications up to now use the furse-malham standard of
w xyz rstuv klmopq, each being normalized to 0..1, with the exception of
W, which is additionally divided by sqrt(2).
but for political reasons, new plugins should use acn rather than fuma,
so that's what should be defined as a standard first. if there is
sufficient pressure and people are volunteering, another fuma scheme can
always be added.

regards,

jörn

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sat Aug 15 00:15:12 2009