Re: [LAD] Lv2 port replication [for dummies]

On 15 Aug 2009, at 19:25, Steve Harris wrote:
> It's all about making the easy cases easy, and the complex cases
> possible - something I believe in strongly, though I know not everyone
> shares that worldview.
>
> I guess a counter argument could be that hosts that can't handle /
> don't like the additional complexity could just only offer one degree
> of freedom on multiple groups, but I think they'll have a hard job
> knowing what group is the principle one to pick.

I was going to shut up, but I'll just add that I am open to having my
mind changed. It seems like a decent idea in theory. If you can walk
me through some realworld cases (not hypothetical, I have this
requirement coming up stuff), and it doesn't seem like a horrible
burden on the user, or host author. I know it's pretty reasonable from
the plugin authors p.o.v.

I'll note that AU is not a great example to follow though, it's
distinctly horrible to work with. Though not just for this reason.

I'll give it some more thought when I get back, if you've not lost
interest :)

- Steve
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sun Aug 16 00:15:02 2009