On Fri, 14.08.09 12:36, David Robillard (dave@email-addr-hidden) wrote:
> Is there any existing 'standard' for the order of channels for
> higher-than-stereo multi-channel streams?
> For example, for discrete non-interleaved 5.1 (using a full channel for
> the .1) we have 6 channels: left, center, right, rear left, rear right,
> LFE (see http://lv2plug.in/ns/dev/port-groups#FivePointOneGroup)
>
> What order should these be passed in? Any existing practices?
Microsoft WAVEX and Apple CAF encode the channel mappings in a bitmap
that doesn't limit you much in which channels you pick, but it does
imply a specific order:
http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/device/audio/multichaud.mspx#EKLAC
Look for kCAFChannelBit_xxx resp. SPEAKER_xxx.
The CAF wand WAVEX channel mask is identical, however they used
different names for the same channels. (CAF allows more flexible
definitions via a different chunk, too though, which enables
ambisonics). Given that both MS and Apple seem to follow this rule it
might be a good idea to follow it too.
And finally, RFC3551/AIFF-C (see section 4.1 of the RFC) defines an
implicit channel mapping based on the number of channels. In some
cases it might make sense to follow that rule.
Lennart
-- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-devReceived on Sun Aug 16 20:15:03 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Aug 16 2009 - 20:15:03 EEST