Fons.
> Not really. Suppose you have to do this:
>
> 1. copy an audio track from a video recording,
> 2. do some work on it,
> 3. copy the result back to the video recording.
>
> Your (nominal) sample rate is 48k, the video is
> exactly 100s long when played at the exact frame
> rate.
>
> If the the clock used by the video equipment and your
> sample clock are not coherent (not derived from the
> same source), there will be a relative error between
> them, both in steps 1 and 3.
If the source is analogue video (and analogue audio), you derive your
word clock from the VBI/video lines or SMPTE, if you have this information.
If the source is digital, well, there is no problem, since you work on a
fixed number of samples.
So please tell me how this can ever happen in real life?
Flo
-- Machines can do the work, so people have time to think. public key DA43FEF4 x-hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-devReceived on Sat Sep 26 08:15:01 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Sep 26 2009 - 08:15:01 EEST