So what /should/ then be the new name of the spinlock_t that is actually
spinning?
My vote is for spinning_spinlock_t, because that is what I say when I
try to explain the difference. Implicitly also suggests that normal
spinlocks in an RT context aren't really /that/ urgently spinning.
/jma
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 10:46 +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/357800/0fb8fb6f0975403c/
>
> interesting coverage as usual, thanks to lwn for the free-link feature.
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri Oct 23 00:15:02 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Oct 23 2009 - 00:15:02 EEST