On 7 Nov 2009, at 20:15, Chris Cannam wrote:
> 2009/11/7 Jörn Nettingsmeier <nettings@email-addr-hidden-hochschule.de>:
>>> This was a hangover from LADSPA, which had confusing and
>>> contradictory
>>> claims about what should/shouldn't be used to identify ports.
>>>
>>> I still don't think there's consensus there.
>>
>> can you elaborate on this?
>>
>> archive links would be good, too.
>
> I think Steve may be thinking of the inflammatory subject of how you
> identify plugins, not ports. I'm pretty sure LADSPA ports are always
> by number.
Oh you're right, brain fart on my part.
Still the port ID in LV2 was a hangover from LADSPA, which was my main
point.
- Steve
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon Nov 9 00:15:07 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Nov 09 2009 - 00:15:07 EET