On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 16:44 -0600, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
>
> On Sun, 8 Nov 2009, David Robillard wrote:
>
> > pretty good idea. All that is needed as far as maintenance goes is for
> > hosts to supply a simple turtle document that says "I implement foo and
> > bar and baz extensions". The rest can be compiled into whatever fancy
> > human readable form you want, for every single plugin out there, by a
>
> I would vote for XML for this, to better utilize all the parsers,
> transformers, and presentation mechanisms already written and in place.
> This isn't anti-turtle FUD, either. Turtle looks like it was a good
> choice for the interface definitions.
No. Everything LV2 is Turtle. Using a different format would just be
annoying and force the use of multiple technologies where one would do
and is guaranteed to already be used.
-dr
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon Nov 9 04:15:02 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Nov 09 2009 - 04:15:03 EET