On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:44:51 +0100
Jens M Andreasen <jens.andreasen@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 01:24 +0000, Folderol wrote:
> > It's late, but I can't sleep, so...
>
> > set sample rate -> 44.1, 48, 96, ? (default 48)
>
> > If anyone can see any obvious holes in this or simplifications please
> > say so.
>
>
> Crystals controlling inexpensive DAC'c and ADC's will be drifting. There
> should be a solder-iron solution for that, but only as long as they live
> in the same box.
ADCs with built-in very fast conversions (1-2uS), externally triggered
by precision tunable oscillators, these (across different boards)
frequency locked by very slow, averaging FLLs. Phase may be skewed but
frequency should be held.
> Upsampling to 192k at the receiving end to better hide the
> skipped/inserted samples might be an idea.
Or possibly interpolation between the two either side of the missing
one.
-- Will J Godfrey http://www.musically.me.uk Say you have a poem and I have a tune. Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-devReceived on Thu Nov 26 12:15:02 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Nov 26 2009 - 12:15:02 EET