Re: [LAD] Atomic Operations

On Tuesday 15 December 2009 15:36:04 Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Paul Davis wrote:
> > why not use glib? as some folk like to say: "even Qt does these days" :)
> True... but I'm just trying to avoid a "dependency creep"
> (which becomes a bigger issue when porting to Windows).
> No glib hate. I just don't want to add a dependency to glib
> so that I can use a single class template.

But when its a template, why not include that header in your project?

The original shouldn't change that much that it qualifies as a "must have
external dependency"?

Arnold

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev