Re: [LAD] Anyone have experience with OSS (3 or 4)?

From: <fons@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Dec 17 2009 - 12:18:42 EET

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 09:01:15AM +0000, Victor Lazzarini wrote:

> I would have thought at least Solaris should be able to do audio
> reasonably well. Or am I wrong?

Very right. In terms of multithreading and real-time support
Solaris of ten years ago performed as least as well as Linux
does today. I used it for many realtime DSP projects.

Ciao,

-- 
FA
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Received on Thu Dec 17 16:15:01 2009

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Olivier Guilyardi: "Re: [LAD] Atomic Operations"
Previous message: rosea grammostola: "[LAD] workflow"
Maybe in reply to: Kjetil S. Matheussen: "[LAD] Anyone have experience with OSS (3 or 4)?"
Next in thread: Kjetil S. Matheussen: "Re: [LAD] Anyone have experience with OSS (3 or 4)?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Dec 17 2009 - 16:15:02 EET