Re: [LAD] Anyone have experience with OSS (3 or 4)?

From: Victor Lazzarini <Victor.Lazzarini@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Dec 17 2009 - 16:58:05 EET

Through which API? I not sure I understand audio IO on Vista, with the
concurrent existence of several APIs. Never mind, perhaps this is a
bit OT in a Linux Audio list...

Victor

On 17 Dec 2009, at 14:45, Lennart Poettering wrote:

> On Thu, 17.12.09 09:14, Paul Davis (paul@email-addr-hidden) wrote:
>
>>> If you care about more than pro audio, then you want to dynamically
>>> adjust the sleep times based on the requirements of the clients
>>> connected. That means you cannot use fixed sized hardware fragments
>>> anymore, but need to schedule audio more dynamically using system
>>> timers.
>>>
>>> This in fact is where most of the complexity in systems such as
>>> PulseAudio stems from.
>>
>> and before the accusations start flying, this is also how CoreAudio
>> works on OS X (and even more so in the iPhone "version" of CoreAudio,
>> which doesn't a lot like CoreAudio at all).
>
> And Vista apparently too as it seems.
>
> Lennart
>
> --
> Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc.
> lennart [at] poettering [dot] net
> http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu Dec 17 20:15:01 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Dec 17 2009 - 20:15:01 EET