On Tuesday, December 29, 2009, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
>
> <pedro.lopez.cabanillas@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > The ending in "mm" simply means to me something related to C++. Qt uses
> > standard C++ in despite of FUD and propaganda that has been spread
> > everywhere by zealots.
>
> zealots? i can't think of a single C++ related project whose name ends
> in "mm" that is not in some what related to the work of murray cumming
> and rest of the team that wrap GNOME in C++ bindings. am i missing
> out?
I'm not willing to polemize with you, but my affirmation was very clear: Qt
uses standard C++ and the propaganda saying otherwise is FUD. I'm sorry if
you felt identified by the name "zealot".
On the other hand: the name I've given to my library is only my own bussines,
unless there is a clash with another piece of software with the same name. Is
there such thing?
> > It is not likely to happen, but if somebody writes a wrapper around the
> > ALSA sequencer API using sigc, gobjects and other gnome friendly
> > frameworks, wouldn't be more appropriate to name it gaseq ?
>
> sigc has nothing whatsoever to do with gnome.
> gobjects have nothing whatsoever to do with any of the *mm wrappers,
> fundamentally.
On Monday, December 28, 2009, torbenh wrote:
> hmm... maybe its just me. but to me the name aseqmm would imply it uses
> sigc and gobjects.
>
> wouldnt qaseq be amore appropriate name ?
I've copied the original comment, that I've answered and you apparently can't
read.
Let's stop fighting about terminology, and tell me what is the true origin of
your wraith against me.
Regards,
Pedro
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Tue Dec 29 04:15:08 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 29 2009 - 04:15:08 EET