On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 05:05:01PM +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:
> Aside from that, we have to forget about everything that has anything
> to do with GTK+. None of what you look forward to is even remotely
> possible with the examples and advice given so far (I mean just one
> look at libphat is..urghhh just another gtk design).
>
> Flashy and elegant is Qt's forte, because LMMS has done it. Your
> resulting app can be simple, good-looking, skinnable. There's EFL, but
> no-one knows whether it's even usable for multimedia.
what is this ? gui flamewars ?
idiots.
-- torben Hohn _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-devReceived on Tue Dec 29 12:15:07 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 29 2009 - 12:15:07 EET