Chris Cannam <cannam@email-addr-hidden-day-breakfast.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Nedko Arnaudov <nedko@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>> Chris Cannam <cannam@email-addr-hidden-day-breakfast.com> writes:
>>> OK... That sounds rather hazardous to me. To lose all of one's data
>>> instead of saving it, after a potentially long session's work, because
>>> of a check box incorrectly checked when starting the application,
>>> surely wouldn't please many users?
>>
>> And you are suggesting what?
>
> Uh, I think you've lost me a bit, Nedko. What do I appear to be suggesting?
Mmmm, suggesting as proposing
> I'm just saying that it might not be such a good idea for a session
> manager to kill applications instead of saving them, when asked to
> save. Especially if that decision is based on user input that
> happened a long time ago (so that the user may have done a lot of work
> since making their mistake, but before discovering it was a mistake).
What better alternative you propose? ladish will implement levels 2 and
3 in future.
-- Nedko Arnaudov <GnuPG KeyID: DE1716B0>
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jan 08 2010 - 16:15:03 EET