On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Nedko Arnaudov <nedko@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> Yes the goal is to have simple to implement state save "message" that
> does not require additional libraries.
Well, I suppose as long as users are made aware that enabling it for
applications they aren't absolutely sure support it is a dangerous
thing to do. I don't like it, I think it's a simplification too far,
but then I'm not one of the people using it.
> Maybe you can watch the video, it is less than 5 minutes long.
I did actually watch that, when it was announced.
> Desktop session handler traditionally relies on X11. The trend in
> freedesktop (KDE, GNOME) is to use D-Bus as IPC instead. I'm not aware
> of D-Bus desktop session manager.
GNOME is starting to use one. gnome-session switched to it in GNOME
2.24, completely breaking backward compatible session management
during that release series for lots of users, including me. Badly
done, but not intrinsically technically wrong.
> In future, ladish aims to save/restore window
> properties like window position, virtual desktop and screen
> (multimonitor).
That does sound like a desktop session manager to me.
Chris
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri Jan 8 16:15:04 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jan 08 2010 - 16:15:04 EET