Re: [LAD] tschack ... early version of smp enabled jack1

--- On Tue, 1/26/10, Chris Cannam <cannam@email-addr-hidden-day-breakfast.com> wrote:

> From: Chris Cannam <cannam@email-addr-hidden-day-breakfast.com>
> Subject: Re: [LAD] tschack ... early version of smp enabled jack1
> To: "torbenh" <torbenh@email-addr-hidden>
> Cc: linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
> Date: Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 7:38 AM
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 9:05 PM,
> torbenh <torbenh@email-addr-hidden>
> wrote:
> > since i dont want to let jack1 codebase die in a
> feature freeze,
> > i added some features.
> >
> > - smp aware
> > - clickless connections
>
> Is there any reason why a user would prefer this over
> jack2?
>

and would I assume correctly that one of the reasons to not let the jack1 codebase "die" (or freeze) is that it is written in C as opposed to jack2 ?

J.

      
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Tue Jan 26 20:15:03 2010