Re: [LAD] hard realtime performance synth

On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:39:51 -0600 (CST)
"Gabriel M. Beddingfield" <gabrbedd@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, David McClanahan wrote:
>
> > Who wants a DAW. I'd be happy a while with a stable minimoog emulator. The
> > Bristol has that and CS80(descendant of Yamaha's GX-1). It'd be cool just to
> > have a stable, glitch a day, analog-like synth such as these. As it is now
>
> Well, knock yourself out. Make us all proud!
>
> > with Ubuntu's Studio packages, Bristol locks up and then locks up the
> > operating system as does Zyn. FluidSynth works but will glitch quite a bit.
>
> As Torben said, Bristol and Zyn are well-known to be
> programmed in a manner that is NOT RT-safe... even if the OS
> is RT-safe.

Just want to make the point that Zyn. is a moving target, under
development again. Also there is the Yoshimi derivative which I'm
finding to be very stable.

-- 
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev