Re: [LAD] CV data protocol in apps.

From: <fons@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Feb 19 2010 - 19:30:20 EET

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:40:51AM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:

> my feeling precisely. the storage issue is an interesting one, but not
> clearly an imperative. i do think that a general purpose event data
> type would be useful.
 
1/16 (3 kHz) is actually overkill for normal audio control.
Digital mixers typically sample their physical controls at
lower rates. Psycho-acoustic arguments would require less
as well. Going up to 1/16 is motivated mainly by the fact
that 16 frames is more or less the shortest Jack period
that makes sense in practice, and you still have a control
sample in each period. A higher rate also makes it much
easier to upsample to audio rate if that would be required,
a simple 1-line lowpass filter is all you need.

Ciao,

-- 
FA
O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
E guerra e morte !
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri Feb 19 20:15:04 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Feb 19 2010 - 20:15:04 EET