Re: [LAD] ambisonics UHJ encoder

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:01 PM, <fons@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:35:42PM +0300, alex stone wrote:
>
>> So in this case, i would run 2 instances of jconvolver, one for the
>> tail, and one for the UHJ conf?
>
> One for the reverb and one for the UHJ encoder.
>
> In theory you *could* combine them into a single
> configuration, just use separate ins/outs for
> each part. I wouldn't recommend doing this.
>
> Note that the UHJ encoder has a delay of 2048
> samples, the price to pay for a very accurate
> 90 degrees phase shifter. This could be decreased,
> but would require a shorter Hilbert transform
> IR which is not provided in the current release.
>
> Ciao,
>
> --
> FA
>
> O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
> E guerra e morte !
>

Yes, i've just discovered the delay. No problem with that. i'd rather
have a better quality, than haste. I'll use 2 instances of JC as per
your recommendation.

Any recommendations for a delay? I've found a couple in the ladspa
collection, but so far they're not up to my particular task.

Thanks for the help.

Alex.

-- 
www.openoctave.org
midi-subscribe@email-addr-hidden
development-subscribe@email-addr-hidden
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev