Re: [LAD] ambisonics UHJ encoder

On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:48 PM, torbenh <torbenh@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:58:54PM +0100, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
>> hi alex, fons!
>> since you are dealing with artificial sources anyways, why stick to
>> first order? do your panning in higher order instead. the use of
>> resources is minimal (although it will create an insane amount of jack
>> ports, so use -P2048). it won't make any difference to your UHJ, since
>> it only ever sees WXY, but it would enable you to produce really crisp
>> n.1 or HOA decodes without any extra work.
>
> since he already uses -P2048 i guess, its -P8192 or even higher now :D
>
> --
> torben Hohn
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
>

I'm on 4096 now. we'll see what happens, but i'm wearing out the abacus.

:)

-- 
www.openoctave.org
midi-subscribe@email-addr-hidden
development-subscribe@email-addr-hidden
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev