Re: [LAD] Descent synth as dssi

From: Louigi Verona <louigi.verona@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Mar 05 2010 - 13:20:42 EET

If you can finance LASH development by giving jobs to 2-3 dedicated coders -
it might be a good way to force it. Other than that I am not sure.

On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Gerald Mwangi <gerald.mwangi@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> Hi, maybe you can enlighten me on the alternatives.
> It just seems to me that the majority of audio devs, simply don't seem
> to care about session management. So my idea is just to force them to.
> Gerald
>
> On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 13:47 +0300, alex stone wrote:
>
> >
> > I disagree with LASH inclusion in jack itself.
> > There is work going to consider alternatives at the moment.
> >
> > Alex.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
>

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri Mar 5 16:15:03 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Mar 05 2010 - 16:15:03 EET