On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 12:25 AM, <fons@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 04:32:39AM +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:
>
>> After further testing, it appears JACK_PROMISCUOUS_SERVER no longer
>> works. Paul, is that intentional?
>
> Indeed it doesn't. There's at least one error in
> /etc/conf.d/jack-audio-connection-kit: the '-d'
> in the driver options leads to a double '-d' in
> the final command line. But that isn't the reason
> things don't work.
>
> It should be noted that Archlinux provides the
> script in /etc/rc.d but does not in any way use
> it unless the user takes action (that is normal
> Arch policy, if you want any daemons you have to
> add them manually to /etc/rc.conf). So far I was
> completely unaware of its existence.
>
> I'd be *VERY HAPPY* if jackd could be used as
> a system daemon, with e.g. access limited to
> members of a the audio group. Or even unlimited.
> It would simplify things here *A LOT*.
>
> Ciao,
>
> --
> FA
>
> O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
> E guerra e morte !
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
>
Out of curiosity, what's the pros and cons of using jackd as a system daemon?
Alex.
-- www.openoctave.org midi-subscribe@email-addr-hidden development-subscribe@email-addr-hidden _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-devReceived on Mon Mar 8 00:15:19 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Mar 08 2010 - 00:15:19 EET