Re: [LAD] automation on Linux (modular approach)

From: <fons@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Mar 19 2010 - 22:51:50 EET

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 03:16:14PM -0400, Tim E. Real wrote:

> Automation, especially audio automation, is extremely important.
> Some examples:
> When recording real musicians playing real instruments, you don't just
> record one take, you record several takes, then pick the best one and
> use the others to patch up the odd mistakes within the best take.
> Without automation, it is impossible to do this.

Others have already pointed out that you can do all
of this in Ardour without automation. There is more:
it's non-destructive, and *much faster* than any
form of automation could ever be.

And don't forget that 90% of all music that is still
popular today has been produced without any form of
automation, and even without the editing facilities
that e.g. Ardour provides - just using 16 or 24-track
tapes (and in many cases even less). If you can't do
a decent fade-out manually you just have to learn and
do it. Agreed, it's easier with a real P&G fader than
with one you have to move by mouse.

Ciao,

-- 
FA
O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
E guerra e morte !
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sat Mar 20 00:15:03 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Mar 20 2010 - 00:15:03 EET