Re: [LAD] automation on Linux (modular approach)

From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@email-addr-hidden-dsl.net>
Date: Mon Mar 22 2010 - 14:20:11 EET

Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>> But it's no
>>> big deal. Either you just remember to push the fader
>>> at the right time, or today, using Ardour, you can
>>> just cut out that fragment and move it to a separate
>>> track with its own EQ and level. I find this a lot
>>> easier than using automation.
>>>
>> In MusE you can leave the fragment alone and just do some automation
>> tweaking for it, or move the fragment as you say to its own track
>> with a different volume, but you must supply any desired cross-fade
>> automation events, it's not as advanced as Ardour.
>
> I dunno, but perhaps for Muse it's the way like it is for Qtractor?
> You need to use the mouse and move the graphic of the recordings at
> the end and the beginning of overlapping tracks [1]? IMO this is much
> easier than moving a virtual fader.
>
> But ok, everything about this was written and you prefer automation,
> that's ok, but you can see that some people do it without automation.
> It's possible, nothing is missing.
>
> Ralf

[1] Oops, not "tracks" it should be "takes" (or parts, clips, segments)
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon Mar 22 20:15:05 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Mar 22 2010 - 20:15:05 EET