Re: [LAD] automation on Linux (modular approach)

From: Nick Copeland <nickycopeland@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Mar 22 2010 - 17:47:57 EET

> For filters etc. most times just 128 steps are enough, hardware synth
> tend to use just 128 steps even when using SysEx instead of CC.

Just 128 steps for filter cutoff for an oscillating emphasis does not work well
if it needs to be tuned exactly to an VCO/DCO, it is basically never in tune
and was a big grumble about the early programable analogues since they
only had 64 to 128 steps available for filter frequency from their AD control
converters and memories. Two bytes does go a long way towards the goal and
it pretty much on if it is not applied as literal Hz but as a power scale.

Somebody asked which soft synths would support this kind of feature, Bristol
will be implementing CV in the next release for subset of its emulators.

Regards, nick.
                                               
_________________________________________________________________
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon Mar 22 20:15:07 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Mar 22 2010 - 20:15:07 EET