On Mon, April 12, 2010 09:26, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> polyphonic case, it should be c). Doubling a note seems perfectly
> reasonable to me and accidental surplus Note-Ons are simply not
> acceptable (I'm also not aware of that being a common problem).
Ok, ok, ok, my last question, this has got me all flummoxed but I now
believe I've figured it out - please confirm!
And as per hints regarding musical instruments which use the (non-digital)
materials they're made of to produce sound...
A string of note-ons following each other all for the same pitch n without
any intervening note-offs for pitch n, IS PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE provided
they are INTENTIONAL and NOT accidental.
I never said this would be unintentional nor a result of lousy programming
;-)
Please say so, yes, that is correct, please..
James.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Tue Apr 13 04:15:03 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Apr 13 2010 - 04:15:03 EEST