Re: [LAD] successive note on midi events

From: Arnold Krille <arnold@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Apr 13 2010 - 09:40:27 EEST

On Tuesday 13 April 2010 02:21:54 Jens M Andreasen wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 00:55 +0100, James Morris wrote:
> > A string of note-ons following each other all for the same pitch n
> > without any intervening note-offs for pitch n, IS PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE
> > provided they are INTENTIONAL and NOT accidental.
>
> Yes, except for that this is an absurdity that could only happen by
> accidental programming.

Or by doubling/tripling a part in the sequencer to get more volume in the
sound.

Of course this really should then be a second (and third) midi-channel, but if
the sound used allows it, I don't see a problem with this behaviour.

Have fun,

Arnold

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Received on Tue Apr 13 12:15:02 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Apr 13 2010 - 12:15:02 EEST