On 17 April 2010 04:33, Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> Clearly, we can't dispose of that. But to what extent should the
> future development path of JACK be determined by the limitations of
> packaging systems?
>
> Does anyone really want to have to choose between JACK1 and JACK2 (and
> tschak? perhaps) on a permanent basis? Does anyone want to step up and
> make the hard decision about NetJACK1 or NetJACK2? Can that decision
> even *be* made? Is that supposed to be my job?
Man, am I glad to see that response.
-- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-devReceived on Sat Apr 17 00:15:08 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Apr 17 2010 - 00:15:08 EEST