Paul Davis wrote:
> We didn't write JACK to be part of the desktop
> environment, we wrote it as a tool for people doing serious
> audio&music work.
Full ACK, from the standpoint of a user.
> the right thing being that
> anyone can implement their own version of JACK and if its compliant
> then anyone can use it at any time.
Full ACK, from the standpoint of a user.
> I can understand
> why newcomers to this ecosystem would not share their opinion.
Because users, even users who developed well known professional audio
equipment are dissed as idiots, from the standpoint of a developer of
well known professional audio equipment.
It seems to be that users are unimportant, resp. desktop users seems to
be important regarding to JACK.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sat Apr 17 04:15:01 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Apr 17 2010 - 04:15:01 EEST