Re: [LAD] distros migrating to JACK2?

Adrian Knoth wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:09:53AM +0200, Philipp wrote:
>
>
>> I don't really know, nor care, about debian specific packaging stuff.
>> What I know is that it has a record of being broken.
>>
>
> Stop that FUD. Ok, a lot was broken until last year, but I fixed
> everything and worked closely together with upstreams.
>
> If you have something that needs improvement, simply tell me.
>
> In general, calling the pro-audio stack in Debian to be broken is barely
> justifiable. Hint: Torben uses Debian unstable.
>
> Of course, I cannot be held responsible for our spin-offs like Ubuntu in
> all its incarnations (studio, xubuntu, kubuntu, whatever).
>
>
>> Here's an article where some of the technicalities are discussed in the
>> comments: http://ardour.org/node/2543
>>
>
> Old stuff. Check the expiry date of your truths. Reality changes over
> time.
>

What's broken for which distro is half OT, IMO the topic should be the
free choice of JACK1 and JACK2. At the end it's not important if there
is one package or if there are 5 packages for each JACK. JACK3, DBUS at
the moment are also less important.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sun Apr 18 16:15:02 2010