On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 4:21 PM, rosea.grammostola
<rosea.grammostola@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> This could all be true, but that's not the point I was talking about.
> JACK2 was planned as successor of JACK1. But at some point that changed,
No, Jack2 (then jackdmp) was not planned as a successor of Jack1. It
was initially planned as an alternate implementation and a playground
to try out some ideas, mostly because Stephane didn't feel that it was
going to be easy to do that with the existing C codebase of Jack (and
I think that everybody else agreed with him about that). *Later*, we
agreed that Jack2 would become the successor of Jack1.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon Apr 19 04:15:02 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 19 2010 - 04:15:02 EEST