Re: [LAD] Kernel Opinions: .31-rt or .33-rt?

torbenh wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 08:11:31PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
>> torbenh wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:27:07AM -0500, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
>>>
>>>> Does anyone out there have an opinion on linux kernel 2.6.31-rt vs.
>>>> 2.6.33-rt for audio?
>>>>
>>> i am in the process of updating.
>>> had some problems with udev not creating device nodes for my HD
>>> partitions.
>>>
>>> i think i solved them. (didnt reboot yet)
>>> make sure the deprecated sysfs interface is off.
>>>
>>> CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2
>>>
>>> according to blackpenguin the symptoms match.
>>> i also had a lockup when hal was started.
>>>
>>> dunno... 2.6.31-rt (which i am running now) was a little bit less painless.
>>>
>> Do you build it for Debian or Ubuntu? When I tried to build it for
>> Hardy (64 Studio) the same way as I build my current kernel uname -r
>> 2.6.31.12-rt20, it failed.
>> http://lists.64studio.com/pipermail/64studio-users/2010-April/004359.html
>>
>
> debian. dunno. still seems to be wrong.
> i am running it now, but i needed to mknod the HD device nodes.

Do you build the kernel using make-kpkg? To be honest, for Hardy I never
used "--append-to-version=-1", but I did this for Karmic and there it
worked for 2.6.31.12-rt21-1. However that be, modifying
debian/ruleset/misc/version_vars.mk

-UTS_RELEASE_VERSION=$(shell if [ -f include/linux/version.h ]; then \
- grep 'define UTS_RELEASE' include/linux/version.h | \
+UTS_RELEASE_VERSION=$(shell if [ -f include/linux/utsrelease.h ]; then \
+ grep 'define UTS_RELEASE' include/linux/utsrelease.h | \

might solve the problem?!

Ralf
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri Apr 30 00:15:02 2010