Re: [LAD] More about de-normals - some test results.

From: Tim E. Real <termtech@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri May 07 2010 - 02:29:39 EEST

On May 4, 2010 10:10:13 am you wrote:
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Tim E. Real <termtech@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > Haven't tested Ardour yet, but what do you think about this, Paul?
> > I suppose Ardour's processor flags option *must* cure it?
>
> should fix the problem if it was denormals, but i don't think that the
> values you are seeing there are denormals (too big). i'm not sure about
> that though.

Good point. The values may be a little bit too high for that.
The system starts chugging right around when those values I showed
 start to appear (around +/-1e-18 +/-1e-19 or so).

The problem may really still have been inside the plugin,
 and not the fault of passing these values to Jack later.
Inside the plugin maybe much lower values are tossed around,
 before the higher values appear at the output.

It never occurred to me, but the plugin's AC coupling makes
 perfect sense now, being models of real electronic devices,
 complete with input coupling capacitors.
Some plugins would have it, others wouldn't.

Thanks. Tim.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri May 7 04:15:03 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri May 07 2010 - 04:15:03 EEST