On 05/23/10 17:14, Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
> On 05/23/2010 10:22 PM, Chris Cannam wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> ... by which I don't mean to imply that I can't understand it
>> (although, with C++, there is always the possibility that I _think_ I
>> can understand it but am sadly mistaken because of some weird shit
>> happening behind the scenes). I just mean that I can't simply read
>> it.
>
> I once read a great (and funny) article arguing that you simple can't assume
> anything about what the following means in C++:
>
> a = b + c
>
> Nothing
You can assume quite a bit, if you are willing to assume something that
could be wrong. ;)
If that doesn't work as expected, then whoever over-rode operator+ and
operator= probably need some form of abuse.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon May 24 08:15:02 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 24 2010 - 08:15:02 EEST